MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. — It all comes down to the light. At least in plant species diversity in fertilized grasslands.
Fertilizing by humans and plant-eating by herbivores can combine to benefit plant biodiversity — if enough light still reaches the ground, according to a study by ecologists Elizabeth Borer and Eric Seabloom of the University of Minnesota and colleagues.
The findings are important in a world where humans are changing both where herbivores are found and the supply of plant nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.
The Nutrient Network
To conduct the study, Borer and Seabloom enlisted the help of the Nutrient Network, or NutNet, an experiment they and other researchers began as a way to understand how grasslands around the world respond to changing environments.
NutNet scientists at 40 sites set up plots with and without added fertilizer and with and without fences to keep out local herbivores such as deer, kangaroos, sheep or zebras. The research took place in the United States, Canada, China, Australia, Switzerland, United Kingdom, South Africa, Tanzania, Germany and Argentina.
The scientists’ hypothesis was that grassland plant species losses caused by eutrophication (overfertilization) could be offset by the increased light availability that results when taller plants are munched down by herbivores like deer and sheep.
This “trimming” by herbivores ultimately lets in more light, fueling increased plant growth.
The experiment, replicated in 40 grasslands on six continents, demonstrated the researchers had it right. (Story continues under photo.)
“Global patterns of biodiversity have largely defied explanation due to many interacting, local driving forces,” said Henry Gholz, a program director in the National Science Foundation’s Division of Environmental Biology, which funded coordination of the research, along with the many institutions involved.
“These results show that grassland biodiversity is likely largely determined by the offsetting influences of nutrition and grazing on light capture by plants,” Gholz said.
In the study, the ecologists measured the amount of plant material, the light reaching the ground and the number of species of plants in the plots.
What grows where?
When the scientists compared results across the sites, they found that fertilizer both reduced the number of plant species in the plots and favored those that were faster-growing.
Species less able to tolerate a lack of light in shady conditions were literally overshadowed by their faster-growing neighbors. So there were fewer kinds of plants, but taller-growing ones.
An herbivore is an herbivore is an herbivore?
In both fertilized and unfertilized plots, removal of vegetation by herbivores increased the amount of light reaching the ground. The taller plants were eaten by the herbivores. Then plant species diversity increased.
The results were the case whether the grassland was in Minnesota, the United Kingdom or Tanzania, and whether the herbivores were rabbits, sheep or elephants.
“This suggests that these effects dovetail with changes in light availability at the ground level,” said Borer. “That appears to be a big factor in maintaining or losing biodiversity in grasslands.”
Sunlight a key
In short, Borer said, “where we see a change in light, we see a change in biodiversity” for the better.
The findings offer important insights into how humans are affecting prairies, savannas, alpine meadows and other grasslands by adding fertilizers. In showing how fertilization, grazing, light availability and biodiversity are linked, scientists are closer to understanding grassland ecosystems in a changing world.