Shift from forest to crops lowers temps

BOULDER, Colo. – The large-scale conversion of forests to croplands in the Midwestern United States over the last century has led to a measurable cooling of the region’s climate, according to Gordon Bonan of the National Center for Atmospheric Research.

The new study is the first to document the link between regional climate change and a major change in temperate forest cover.

“Human uses of land, especially clearing of forest for agriculture and reforestation of abandoned farmland, are an important cause of regional climate change,” concludes Bonan.

The cooling is the result of the changeover of the region to crops, which reflect more sunlight back into space than forests.

The impact of land-use changes on climate is currently one of the most uncertain factors contributing to climate warming, according to the latest report from the United Nations/World Meteorological Organization Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Past research.

Most of the work to date on this subject has been with computer models and has focused on deforestation in the tropics in areas such as the Amazon.

Bonan’s is one of the first observational studies on the effect of temperate forest changes on regional climate.

His own earlier model results hinted at this cooling effect in the U.S. Midwest, but Bonan wanted to go further.

Since accurate temperature and land-use records do not exist for the U.S. Midwest 150 years ago, when agriculture began to deforest the region, Bonan relied on a direct modern-day comparison between temperatures in predominantly forested areas and those in cropland areas to see if the different types of land cover were associated with different temperatures.

Data used.

He used temperatures from 65 U.S. weather reporting stations from 1986 to 1995, where the surrounding land was either crops or forests and there were no nearby cities or water bodies, which can have their own distinct effects on temperatures.

The cropland sites were predominantly in the Midwest, where 80 percent of the land is now under cultivation; the forested stations were in the Northeast, where just 20 percent of the land is now agricultural.

Temperature difference.

The data showed that the daily temperature range – the difference between the highest (usually daytime) and lowest (usually nighttime) temperature in a day – was lower in the Midwest than in the forested Northeast.

This was because the daytime heating of agricultural stations across the Midwest was consistently lower than that of the forested northeastern stations.

The result was a surprise, because previous regional climate studies showed that the Midwest should have a larger daily temperature range than the Northeast, due to the moderating influence of clouds on daytime heating.

Surprise findings.

The eastern United States is generally cloudier than the Midwest, and more clouds reflect more solar energy back into space.

The daily high temperatures at the surface in the East should, therefore, rise less than in the unshielded Midwest.

Bonan’s new study found that temperatures in the Midwest did not rise as much during the day as they did in the Northeast, contrary to what was expected from these regional differences in cloud cover.

To make sure that the results he was seeing were not happening in only one decade of the temperature/land-use measurements, Bonan also analyzed a 100-year record of U.S. temperatures.

Differences.

Before 1940, when the two regions had more similar amounts of cropland, the difference in regional daily highs was much smaller than it is today.

Since 1940, as agriculture continued to spread across the Midwest and northeastern farm lands returned to forests, the temperature difference steadily increased.

The Northeast became warmer in the spring and summer as forests returned.

Comments are closed.

eNewsletter

Get our Top Stories in Your Inbox

Recent News