WASHINGTON — An approach to agricultural labor reform that focuses solely on immigration enforcement would raise food prices over five years by an additional 5 to 6 percent and would cut the nation’s food and fiber production by as much as $60 billion.
Those are among the results of a report, Gauging the Farm Sector’s Sensitivity to Immigration Reform, conducted by World Agricultural Economic and Environmental Services.
The report was commissioned by the American Farm Bureau Federation and released in conjunction with the #ifarmimmigration grassroots campaign, a month-long campaign sponsored by AFBF and the Partnership for a New American Economy to promote the need for agricultural immigration reform.
By far, the best scenario for farm labor reform, both for consumers and farmers, is one that includes immigration enforcement, a redesigned guest worker program and the opportunity for skilled laborers currently working in agriculture to earn an adjustment of status.
Under that scenario, there would be little to no effect on food prices, and the impact on farm income would be less than 1 percent.
Today, U.S. agriculture depends heavily on falsely documented or undocumented workers and regardless of the reform scenario studied, it is clear that a legal workforce comes at a price.
The hardest-hit domestic food sectors under an enforcement-only scenario are fruit production, which would plummet by 30-61 percent, and vegetable production, which would decline by 15-31 percent.
The study also pointed out that while many consider fruit and vegetable production the most labor-reliant sector, livestock production in the U.S. would fall by 13-27 percent.
“Most Americans believe that they have outgrown farm work, which is reflected in their unwillingness to take farm jobs, even temporarily,” said Bob Stallman, AFBF president.
“The bottom line of this study is that we either import our labor or we import our food.”
The study compared changes in farm output, commodity prices, farm income, farm asset values, and food prices across four generic reform alternatives. The study is posted at: www.fb.org/newsroom/nr/nr2014/02-10-14/labor-study14c0207.pdf.