Letter writer: Not satisifed with exotic animal bill

Print

Remember Civics 101 where they taught us about the ‘checks and balances’ in our three branches of government — executive, legislative and judicial?

Apparently, John Kasich needs a refresher course in state government. Senate Bill 310 (the exotic animal bill we’ve heard so much about) is supposed to address the issues of public safety and animal welfare. Who could be against that, you ask?

Ah, but in politics, nothing is as it seems. This legislation, which was supposed to discourage ‘casual ownership of dangerous wild animals’ actually targets the federally licensed and inspected professional animal facilities.

Repeated requests for an exemption for facilities such as Rolling Ridge Ranch and The Farm at Walnut Creek (Holmes County) and Stump Hill Farms (Stark County) and many others throughout the state have been denied.

If this bill were about “pet” owners, it would not target facilities that are regularly inspected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to ensure the safety of the public and the welfare of the animals.

Proponents of S.B. 310 testified at committee hearings that S.B. 310 would not have prevented what happened in Zanesville last October, so using Zanesville as justification for the bill seems rather pointless.

Disputes the writer

Sen. Troy Balderson’s name is on this bill, but we may as well say it was written by Gov. Kasich.

Since when does the governor write legislation for the State of Ohio? For that matter, since when does Jack Hanna and HSUS write it? Since when does the governor dictate to the House and Senate committees which amendments and substitute bills they may and may not adopt?

It is the governor’s job to sign or veto a bill, not write it. He has repeatedly threatened to veto S.B. 310 if the bill is changed.

The respective committees heard compelling testimony from many of the business owners who will be impacted by this legislation. The ‘public’ that is purported to be so in favor of the bill was conspicuously absent from the hearings.

Proponents consisted mainly of animal rights organizations; government agencies; out-of-state “sanctuaries” itching to “rescue” (for a price, of course) animals that will become illegal on Jan. 1, 2014; Ohio Farm Bureau (who seems unable to read and follow their own state policy); and zoos that exist on public donations.

The drive-through animal parks and other USDA licensed facilities whose owners actually pay taxes, vote in Ohio, and earn the money to feed and care for their animals, have been totally disregarded.

In the end, the majority of the House committee succumbed to the governor’s pressure and voted the bill through with only a few minor changes. The four who stood firm and voted ‘no’ on the bill are to be commended.

John Kasich is our governor. He is not our senator, our representative, or our judge. He needs to stop threatening our legislators and let them do the jobs we elected them to do.

Polly Britton

Pleasant Hill, Ohio

(The writer is the legislative agent for the Ohio Association of Animal Owners.)

2 Comments

  1. Keith C says:

    Web readers, here is a bit of news for you. THe Cleveland Amory Black Beauty Ranch ran under the name The Fund For Animals, INC, a part of the HSUS empire is also a USDA facility. Therefore, they get no-notice inspections like the rest of us USDA facilites, which were not exempted in this ban. Their May 2 2012 inspection shows where they were written up for not having Adequate Veterinary Care for animals, this is not the first time they have received the same write up.

    Over the past couple years, they have received several write-ups from USDA ranging from expired meds, improper sanitation for the animals, inadequate ventilation and damaged/rusty surfaces.

    Pointing the finger at Ohio’s animal owners about how bad we keep our animals and they themselves have received numerious write-ups. HSUS twists the truth once again.

  2. Dee says:

    This is not to comment on the animal rights bill pro or con. Only to say I’m surprised that you are shocked that the governor (any governor) and his staff, the HSUS or any other group “writes” legislation for the state legislature. This is not uncommon. Interest groups – liberal and conservative – do this frequently. Business and industry lobbies have legal teams write legislation which they then present to their pet legislator to introduce as a bill sponsored by that legislator, who then works to get it passed. The same goes for other interest groups – farmers, animal rights, environmentalists, nursing home operators, hospitals, unions, etc.

    It’s a sad fact of life with politics. Both sides do it, many, many special interest groups are involved. Who’s left out? Individual voters, of course, unless we are lucky enough to be a member of one of the special interest groups (HSUS, Farm Bureau, NRA, Sierra Club, etc.) who have the money, power and lawyers to write legislation that specifically benefits us and our interests.

Leave a Comment

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.

eNewsletter

Get our Top Stories in Your Inbox

Recent News