WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. — The pork industry must take responsibility for its own problems, said a Purdue University Extension marketing specialist.
“That means aggressive liquidation, most likely based on financial attrition,” said Chris Hurt. “That is not a pretty solution, but it is the market solution and markets can be brutal.
“As those producers go down one by one, many of them may lament the crazy times they were caught up in as the biofuels era and the unusual macroeconomic events changed agricultural market relationships in 2008.”
Hurt’s comments came as he reviewed the precarious state of the U.S. pork industry.
“Who is going to bail out the pork industry?” he said. “The Federal Reserve Bank of the United States has recently been in the news helping to assure that a well-known investment bank would remain liquid. The Congress of the United States is considering potential assistance for homeowners caught up in subprime mortgage problems.
“Farm-state politicians in the upper Great Plains hope to add billions of dollars for disaster assistance in the next farm bill, even before there is a disaster. Perhaps they need only to look to the pork industry to see a financial disaster in progress.”
Pork industry-wide losses may total $3.5 billion in 2008, a devastating amount that represents about 25 percent of the total value of production, Hurt added. Hurt noted that there is plenty of blame to go around, including producers who overexpanded production.
The USDA reports that the hog breeding herd on March 1 was unchanged from the year-earlier level. Producers intend to farrow the same number of sows in the spring quarter as one year ago and 2 percent fewer in the summer quarter.
Fall production can be expected to rise by about 1 percent, followed by a decrease of 2 percent next winter.
Hog prices averaged only $39.50 on a live-weight basis in the first quarter of the year. Given the 10 percent increase in production, that price may be higher than would have been expected.
“Prices are going to improve seasonally in coming weeks, but they will remain disappointing for all of 2008,” he said.
“Producers do indicate further cuts in the herd this spring, but that will just modestly reduce farrowings this summer. A much more aggressive liquidation will be needed.”
Purdue University Extension
Second-quarter prices are expected to average only $47, with third-quarter prices at about $48, several dollars lower than had been expected. Fourth-quarter prices may average near $45, with winter prices moving up about $2, he said.
For the entire year of 2008, prices may average about $45, which is the lowest level since 2003.
Unfortunately, Hurt added, there has not been enough sow liquidation yet. In the first quarter, sow slaughter was up about 8 percent from a year ago, but this was only enough to drop the size of the breeding herd by less than 1 percent as of March 1.
“Producers do indicate further cuts in the herd this spring, but that will just modestly reduce farrowings this summer,” he said. “A much more aggressive liquidation will be needed. The magnitude of that liquidation can be debated, but likely needs to be on the order of at least 6-8 percent.
“The sooner that gets under way, the better.”
Feed costs are to blame, as well. With hog prices averaging a mere $5 this year, costs are expected to be near $57 per live hundredweight.
While soybean meal prices have dropped nearly $50 per ton from their highs in early March, corn prices have risen more than 30 cents per bushel and largely offset the advantage of lower meal prices.
“Prospects for 2008 losses now are near $30 per head,” said Hurt.
Futures markets have not provided any comfort for pork hedgers as basis has been weak. In the first quarter, basis levels averaged $7.65 per carcass hundredweight under the nearby futures. This compares with $4 under for the first quarter average over the last five years.
“This means that producers who used futures to hedge their hog production have received about $3.65 per carcass hundredweight less this year than they might have expected from the historical record,” he said.
Ultimately, there will be no bailout for hog producers, Hurt said.
“Maybe their losses will not create a financial panic as was the concern if Bear Stearns were to fail,” he said. “Maybe they do not represent enough votes in an election year as do those with mortgage problems.
“In addition, the pork industry is no longer dominated by millions of small independent family farmers as it once was.”
STAY INFORMED. SIGN UP!
Up-to-date agriculture news in your inbox!