LETTER: Responsibility for animals can’t be taken lightly

Editor:
Thank you for shedding light on animal research — an area of great concern for people from all perspectives — in the recent editorial, “Animal research saves lives of both humans and animals” (May 5, 2011).

Even the 96 percent of us who are comfortable consuming meat, milk and eggs for nourishment struggle with the topic of animal research. Our organization is dedicated to healthy discussion and awareness building of the mutual benefits between humans and animals.

We celebrate those mutual benefits: 1) that we care for animals, provide them shelter, companionship and protection while they are under our ownership, and 2) they in turn provide companionship, recreation, nourishment and sometimes even discovery about our species and theirs.

The responsibility we have to care for animals of all types is one that should not be taken lightly.

Just like pet owners, veterinarians, farmers, fishermen, zookeepers and others in animal care professions have chosen their career path because they have a passion for animals — regardless of their ultimate purpose.

We strive to represent a mainstream viewpoint that includes these uses and encourages the highest quality care for all animals.

You and your readers have done an outstanding job discussing where the mutual benefits lie and where — when handled with care — animal research could be in the best interest of both humans and animals. It is a delicate balance, and we thank you for sharing these perspectives on a very important topic.

David White
Columbus, Ohio

(The author is executive director of the Animals for Life Foundation, www.aflfoundation.org.)

3 Comments

  1. Patrick says:

    In a USDA press release January 12, 2006, Health & Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt said:

    “Currently, nine out of ten experimental drugs fail in clinical studies because we cannot accurately predict how they will behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies.”

  2. mary gibson says:

    Isn’t this farm bureau’s david white? Just curious.

  3. KeithC says:

    In a 2011, May 18th blog Wayne said “We provide hands-on care to more animals than any other organization, but we also work to prevent cruelty—working with lawmakers, corporate leaders, and cultural influencers to drive forward the values and ideals of our cause.”

    The OAAO is a 10,000 member organization and i’ll bet we give more “hands-on” care than HSUS ever would. One might ask what “values and ideals” exactly means, is he referring to the Animal Rights Agenda which we know HSUS, PETA and MFA all subscribe to.

    Very well written letter Dave. Those of us that are Animal Care Professionals do have a passion for animals.

Leave a Comment

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.

eNewsletter

Get our Top Stories in Your Inbox

Services

Recent News