Ohio cattlemen will try checkoff referendum again

COLUMBUS — Cattlemen are going to be asked to cast a vote in a referendum on the Ohio Beef Checkoff in early 2014.

If passed, producers will double the payout from $1 to $2 per head when cattle are sold.

The Ohio Cattlemen’s Association has completed the first step in the process and collected the 1,000 signatures required to undergo a referendum on the Ohio Beef Checkoff.

Now all that is needed is a simple majority vote to get the referendum passed.

Assessment doubled

In simple terms, the referendum will ask producers to increase the state checkoff from $1 per head to $2 per head to support market research, promotion and education that aim to increase consumer demand for beef.

A similar referendum held in 2012 failed.

Previously for the measure to pass, two-thirds of the producers who voted, needed to vote in favor and represent a majority of the volume of the cattle produced in the preceding marketing year. A language update included in the state’s 2014-15 budget legislation changed what was needed for the referendum to pass.

All that is needed now is the simple majority vote (51 percent).

Referendum process

The Ohio Department of Agriculture will oversee the referendum process, which will lead to a vote in the first half of 2014.

The exact dates for voting haven’t been established.

According to Hawkins, the referendum package has been submitted to ODA for review and approval. The next step, once it is approved by the director, will be for it to be published, which then kicks off a 30-day comment period ending with a public hearing.

After that, the director will have to approve and adopt the package, and set the voting period. The voting time frame is generally determined by when the director approves the package for comment and when it is adopted.

The Ohio Beef Checkoff and referendum is regulated by the Ohio Revised Code under the Ohio Beef Marketing Program. Any producer among the more than 17,400 families that marketed cattle in Ohio in the last 12 months will be eligible to vote in the upcoming referendum, including youth who market 4-H and FFA beef projects.

Try, try again

Elizabeth Harsh, Ohio Cattlemen’s Association executive director, said the association leadership felt the referendum was too important not learn from past mistakes and try again to get the referendum passed.

A referendum was held in 2012 to ask for the increase, but it was voted down by 53 percent of the 674 voters.

Harsh said some things will be different this time around based on what the group learned in 2012.

Staying in Ohio

She said OCA is going to work harder at being transparent, adding the OCA and Ohio Beef Council are dedicated to showing producers how the funds generated from the beef checkoff are spent.

She said the additional $1 that will be generated by the sale of each head of cattle will remain in Ohio.

“Currently, 50 cents of every dollar invested stays in Ohio, and the rest goes to support national beef checkoff programs, such as the ‘Beef. It’s What’s for Dinner’ campaign,” said Bill Sexten, Ohio Beef Council chairman, which oversees programs funded by the checkoff.

“With the increase, 100 percent of the second dollar will stay in Ohio, so 75 percent of the total checkoff will benefit Ohio producers.”

The national checkoff, which started in 1985, currently assesses $1 per head for each beef animal marketed. The checkoff has not increased since that time.

The Ohio Beef Checkoff currently generates $305,000 in operating funds for the Ohio Beef Council.

Harsh said one area where the money has been spent in the past year has been a new website for the Ohio Beef Council. It has areas for producers and consumers, answers producers’ questions and helps consumers connect to farmers.

Creating awareness

Harsh said another lesson learned from the failed referendum is to get members out to do more to create awareness of why beef checkoff dollars are important.

“We have to do more, slow down, have a conversation and create awareness of what the beef checkoff dollars do here in Ohio. We need to make a case as to why these dollars are important and why we need them to educate consumers about beef,” said Harsh.

Currently, the OCA is searching for county coordinators to help get the word out about the referendum. Harsh said they will network across the state to help get producers out to vote.

“We have to rely on those with a passion for beef to help us get this done,” said Harsh.

Additional revenue uses

The checkoff increase would generate a total of approximately $900,000 that would stay in Ohio. The Ohio Beef Council uses the money to make sure beef has a presence in Ohio’s schools, conduct more public relations outreach with Ohio food publications, directly connect with consumers through spokesperson training programs, provide nutrition seminars for health professionals and develop a greater statewide media presence through radio and print.

Harsh said the Ohio Cattlemen’s Association did initiate the referendum, however, the organization will not benefit from a checkoff increase.

About the Author

Kristy Foster Seachrist lives in Columbiana County raising sheep and horses. She earned her degree from Youngstown State University and has worked in both print and broadcast journalism. You can follow her on Twitter at http://twitter.com/fosterk96. More Stories by Kristy Foster Seachrist

2 Comments

  1. Cindy Burch says:

    I am TOTALLY 100% AGAINST doubling the checkoff! There are many reasons I am against it, but if you read the letter to the editor in the October 10th issue of the Farm and Dairy, it explains more reasons than I even thought of, or even would have know about. We just sell cull dairy cows, but have to pay the checkoff. I don’t remember getting to vote on allowing the beef checkoff in the first place. Am I going to get to vote on allowing it to DOUBLE? Probably not, but I will HAVE to pay it anyway.

    • mary gibson says:

      Cindy this is how much of Agriculture works in Onio, noone asked f we wanted a broiler CAFO 500 feet west of our home.Trying to sell it for 26 years without one offer with every reator in Stark County listing it and unable to sell it due to the neighborhood brought to it was a wakeup call for changes to the ag laws in Ohio. These are commercial operations and should be taxed as such, have no zoning abatements and be taxed on their sales as they are in most other states. I had to walk away from y lifetime investment in my property due to the laws not being enforced. Ohio should be a state for all, not just farmers.

Leave a Comment

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.

eNewsletter

Get our Top Stories in Your Inbox

Services

Recent News