Hog producers begin to see the first signs of economic recovery

0
1

URBANA, Ill. — The magnitude of losses from pork production operations is declining and profits are expected to turn positive in the spring of 2010, according to Purdue University Extension Economist Chris Hurt.

“On the supply side, the USDA’s Sept. 25 Hogs and Pigs report revealed slightly larger reductions in the herd than had been expected. The breeding herd was down 3.1 percent over the past year compared to an anticipated 2.5 percent. The number of pigs weighing less than 60 pounds was down 3.7 percent compared to an anticipated 1.5 percent reduction. The market herd was down 0.7 percent more than pre-report guesses,” Hurt said.

The breeding herd declined only 5 percent in the past two years and has been partially offset by higher weaning rates and higher market weights.

As a result, production in 2009 dropped only 2 percent with prospects of only a 1 to 2 percent drop in 2010.

Improving demand

However, improving demand will likely have more positive implications for hog prices than reduced supply.

“Many economists believe the recession is over. It is widely anticipated that GDP numbers for the third quarter of 2009 will be positive, signaling the end of this long and deep recession. The U.S. estimate will be released Oct. 29. While the recovery in the U.S. economy will be slow with unemployment staying high, positive growth numbers will tend to help consumers ‘free up’ spending on meat,” Hurt said.

Lower pork prices at the consumer level will also be positive for pork consumption this fall.

“In the first half of 2009, U.S. pork prices averaged $2.95 per retail pound compared to $2.87 in the first half of 2008. It was very difficult to sell larger U.S. pork supplies at higher prices early this year,” Hurt said.

Pattern

However, a pattern of lower retail prices is expected through the fall and winter of 2009.

“Lower pork supplies with lower retail prices should strengthen hog prices and result in a higher portion of the retail pork expenditures flowing back to producers,” Hurt said.

Exports are expected to strengthen as well.

“World economic recovery is expected to have more upside potential than the U.S. recovery. In addition, the value of the U.S. dollar is expected to remain weak and will be another reason that foreign pork purchases could increase,” Hurt said.

Current USDA forecasts are for pork exports to be up 9 percent over the next nine months compared to the same period a year earlier.

“Just as the world economic slowdown helped plunge the animal industries into recession more quickly than the crops sector, the world economic recovery may help lift the animal industries out of recession more quickly than the crops sector,” Hurt said.

With some reduction in domestic production and greater exports, per capita pork availability in the U.S. will be down about 3 to 4 percent in the coming nine months.

Basis

This, along with lower U.S. retail pork prices, improving incomes and improving consumer attitudes will provide the basis for strengthening hog prices.

“Hog prices are expected to average in the high $30s on a live-weight basis for the final quarter of 2009. Prices are expected to rise to the low $40s this winter and then move into the mid-$40s for second quarter averages. Next summer’s prices are expected to rise into the high $40s for an average and the low $50s for weekly highs,” Hurt said.

Lower corn, soybean meal and energy prices will be helpful in reducing losses this fall and winter.

Estimated costs

Estimated costs for this time period are in the $44 to $46 range. Costs may rise to $45 to $47 for the spring and summer of 2010 using current adjusted corn and soybean meal futures prices.

“Given these costs and the hog price outlook, farrow-to-finish producers are expected to lose about $15 per head this fall and $7 per head in the winter. Margins would turn to small profits of about $2 a head in the spring and $12 a head in the summer. For all of 2010, current forecasts are for about $3 per head of profits versus losses of $22 per head in 2009 and $17 of loss in 2008,” Hurt said.

Get our Top Stories in Your Inbox

Next step: Check your inbox to confirm your subscription.

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

We are glad you have chosen to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated according to our comment policy.

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.