Antibiotic resistance not as simple as some think

veterinary medicine
Veterinary medicine in bottle.

URBANA, Ill. — Antimicrobial resistance is a big problem that is getting bigger.

In 2014 the World Health Organization warned that “Without urgent, coordinated action, the world is heading towards a post-antibiotic era, in which common infections and minor injuries, which have been treatable for decades, can once again kill.”

Antimicrobials refer to a wide array of drugs for humans and animals that fight infections caused by bacteria and other disease-causing microbes, such as viruses, fungi, and parasites.

Killing pathogens

If not all pathogens are killed when an antimicrobial is used to fight an infection, the surviving pathogens may pass along their resistant traits and a new, harder-to-treat strain may emerge.

MRSA, or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, a high-profile “superbug,” is one example of drug resistant pathogens.

“There has been an increase in the number of multi-resistant pathogens worldwide,” said Dr. John Herrmann, a public health veterinarian at the University of Illinois College of Veterinary Medicine. “Development of resistance occurs through mutation, selective pressure, and gene transfer. These natural processes can be accelerated by the therapeutic and prophylactic use of antimicrobials in both humans and animals.

“The mechanisms by which microbes develop resistance are fairly well known,” he added. “However, the societal factors contributing to this resistance are controversial.”

Microbes are constantly on the move, transmitted through humans in health care and community settings, pets, food, food animals and crops.

Hospitals are an especially fertile environment for the development of resistant germs because critically ill patients are more susceptible to infections and often need broad spectrum antibiotics.

Looking at facts

One claim frequently heard is that antibiotic use in livestock plays a big role in antimicrobial resistance, but Dr. Herrmann says the facts that don’t support that idea.

“While it is true that more than half of all antibiotics used are used on livestock, it is not true that livestock are the most critical point in creating resistant strains of bacteria,” said Herrmann.

For one thing, many of the antibiotics used for livestock are not used in human medicine, and vice versa. Thus, a strain of bacteria that develops resistance in a livestock population would still be vulnerable to the antibiotics used in human medicine and would not cause problems for people.

Data from Denmark

A great deal of data on this topic have been collected through DANMAP, a program instituted in Denmark in 1995 to monitor and combat the development of antimicrobial-resistant organisms.

Denmark banned the use of antibiotics in animals for growth promotion and disease prevention, with the goal of decreasing the number of cases of antimicrobial-resistant infections in people.

Despite the ban, the use of antibiotics in livestock grew, because therapeutic use went up when prophylactic, or preventive, treatment wasn’t allowed.

There were also increases in human antibiotic consumption and in the number of MRSA infections.

“It doesn’t matter whether antibiotics are used to prevent illness or to treat it: Either way, the drugs get into the environment,” Herrmann concluded. “Over the history of the DANMAP program, antimicrobial use has increased in both humans and animals with the same prevalence of resistant infections despite having many restrictions on the use of antibiotics in livestock.”

Careful oversight

The use of antimicrobials in animals, while not the main cause of antimicrobial resistance in human pathogens, still needs careful oversight by veterinary medical professionals.

The American Veterinary Medical Association has issued a position statement on judicious therapeutic use of antimicrobials that emphasizes the need to protect public and animal health and well-being.

“Antibiotic use in people is what creates the main problem of resistance in human medicine. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be careful with how we use antibiotics in animals as well. Any use of antimicrobials can contribute to resistance and long-term consequences,” said Herrmann.

Do your part

Every person can take steps to limit the growth of resistance.

The World Health Organization urges people to keep vaccinations up to date, wash hands, use condoms, and use antimicrobial drugs exactly and only as prescribed by a qualified health professional.

Ultimately, coordination of efforts between veterinary and human healthcare providers, cooperation by the public, development of new drugs, and reliance on scientific data to find solutions will be necessary if society is to preserve the benefits of infection-fighting medicines.

Speak with your veterinarian if you have questions about antimicrobial resistance.


Up-to-date agriculture news in your inbox!


  1. Dear Dr. Herrmann, You seemed to have overlooked one important point in the spread of microbes that may be resistant to a given antibiotic when that antibiotic was used to treat or promote health in an animal. That animal then sheds it feces and urine in a non contained system/environment. Humans then interact with that material during their care, raising, cleaning up after the animal. These actions then spread the so called super bug to a larger arena where more humans interact with it. On the other hand, humans at least in this country and many others when taking antibiotics for a given prescribed infection defecate in a system which is considered treatable and rendering the microbial population as non infectious, or at least out of contamination to others. This is a very simplistic view of the whole problem when treating animals with the same antibiotics that we as humans use. jim

Leave a Reply to J.H. Wolfram, PhD Cancel reply

We are glad you have chosen to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated according to our comment policy.

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.