Managing crops: How small do we go?


MADISON, Wis. — The use of on-the-go crop and soil sensors has greatly increased the precision with which farmers can manage their crops. But recently released research in Agronomy Journal questions whether more precise management is necessarily more efficient.

Diminishing returns

Researchers discovered the law of diminishing returns applies to precision agriculture, calculating how large of an application area is optimal for precision management techniques.

According to the authors, this change could present significant cost savings for farmers.

In the article, Spatial Analysis of Early Wheat Canopy Normalized Difference Vegetative Index: Determining Appropriate Observation Scale, researcher-authors from West Virginia University, University of Kentucky, University of Kentucky, and the Clark County Cooperative Extension Center, examine how precise sensor and application grids should be for optimal efficiency.

The study

To determine the ideal amount of data needed for precision management, the researchers calculated the optimal combination of physical sensor density (number of sensors along the applicator apparatus) and sensor output density (sensor readings per unit distance along the travel path).

The researchers found that sensor grid size can be increased from the current smallest size of .5 square meters to 5.1 square meters with no significant impact on the overall mapping of a crop’s canopy or field variation.

The larger grid requires fewer sensors and makes fertilizer application easier and more cost efficient. This tenfold increase in grid size could have significant cost savings for farmers using precision management techniques.


Up-to-date agriculture news in your inbox!



We are glad you have chosen to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated according to our comment policy.

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.