‘I decree’: Farm policy by fiat

0
22
(Farm and Dairy file photo)

It’s hard, messy work to make U.S. farm and food policy. It’s even harder and messier if anyone in Congress actually proposes policy, actually holds hearings to examine that policy, actually debates and, then, actually votes on how it might affect every farmer, rancher, and eater in the country.

Last minute

Easier by far is to sneak any policy idea or change into some must-pass, end-of-the-session, catch-all budget bill one week before Christmas. Later, even as the smoke still hangs in the back room air, you then can brag about how this was “the best deal you could get given the time constraints all were under.” But last-minute lawmaking isn’t lawmaking; it’s deal making where Congress bends to Big Money in an opaque horse-trading process that often tramples the will of the American people.

The latest proof arrived Dec. 16, when the $1.1 trillion, omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 was dropped on Congress by an unnamed group of White House, Senate, and House negotiators. No one knew everything the must-pass legislation included. How could they? It was 2,009 pages long and no one had read it before the wheeler-dealers rammed it through Congress, horns and all, within 48 hours. Only later did a complete list of the bill’s woolly “riders” come to light.

Gov. spending

For example, after years of Republican grandstanding over “pay-as-you-go” spending — any new federal spending had to be offset by budget cuts — 246 House Republicans, an easy majority, voted for 52 tax breaks worth a budget-busting $622 billion without so much as one mention, wink or nod to their sacred pay-go standard.

Forgetful pay-go GOP members, however, had plenty of Democratic help in agreeing to repeal the 40-year ban on U.S. crude oil exports, probably the most important Republican requirement in the bill. In fact, Democrats carried the entire omnibus over the finish line in the Senate; 38 Dems voted with only 27 Repubs to ensure its filibuster-proof passage. No one knows exactly what the repeal means for oil company profits. Some experts, though, estimate it could add $30 billion per year to Big Oil’s bottom line.

Climate agreement

To make the dirty deal even dirtier, Dems on either end of Pennsylvania Avenue had spent the previous Saturday, Dec. 12, warmly praising a climate agreement (signed in Paris by 195 countries and the U.S.) that will “dramatically reduce greenhouse gases” by “gradually reducing reliance on fossil fuels in favor of cleaner forms of energy.” As such, it looks like we plan to meet our end of the Paris bargain by selling future American CO2 emissions — for a profit, of course — on the world market as crude oil.

COOL

The absolute height of the omnibus’s legislative hypocrisy, however, came with its repeal of mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) for beef and pork, a federal law favored by nearly 90 percent of the grocery-buying public. Congress bailed on COOL after Mexico and Canada, with ample help from the global Meatpacker Gang, threatened $1 billion in retaliatory trade sanctions for harm each said the law was doing to their domestic cattle and hog markets.

The World Trade Organization backed Canada and Mexico — big shock that an international trade organization favors international trade, eh? — while U.S. courts backed American law and American livestock growers. Rather than fight — as we did for nearly a decade when Brazil imposed similar WTO-backed sanctions over U.S. cotton policy — American policymakers caved to Canada and Mexico despite the openly flawed, highly one-sided analysis both used to make their WTO case.

Getting it passed

Not that it mattered. Like most things in Washington, the only thing that mattered in getting the omnibus bill passed was getting the omnibus bill passed. Everything else either along the way — budget hypocrisy, climate sell-out, even independent American livestock farmers — was open to compromise. And, boy, were they compromised.

STAY INFORMED. SIGN UP!

Up-to-date agriculture news in your inbox!

<
SHARE
Previous articleSome tips for using fuel oil safely
Next articleThe New Year
Alan Guebert was raised on an 800-acre, 100-cow southern Illinois dairy farm. After graduation from the University of Illinois in 1980, he served as a writer and editor at Professional Farmers of America, Successful Farming magazine and Farm Journal magazine. His syndicated agricultural column, The Farm and Food File, began in June, 1993, and now appears weekly in more than 70 publications throughout the U.S. and Canada. He and spouse Catherine, a social worker, have two adult children. farmandfoodfile.com

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.