Bill would give local control over wind, solar farm approval

solar panels in an array in Ohio in the winter

A new Ohio Senate bill would put control of approving new large wind and solar developments in the hands of townships.

Senate Bill 52 would set up a referendum process on certain wind farm and solar facility certificates before the projects go before the Ohio Power Siting Board.

The legislation was introduced by Republican Sens. Bill Reineke, of Tiffin, and Rob McColley, of Napoleon.

Local control

There’s a lack of public awareness about these types of projects, Reineke said, during the first hearing for the bill, Feb. 17, in the Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee.

Large utility-scale wind and solar projects are certified through the Ohio Power Siting Board and, currently, do not need local approval to be built. There is a public comment process through the power siting board, but Reineke said it’s not meaningful or effective for residents.

“The intent of the legislation is not to thwart wind development or the development of renewable energy in Ohio at all,” Reineke said during the hearing. “Senate Bill 52 aims to allow local citizens to decide what is best for their community instead of leaving that decision to people in Columbus, unelected bureaucrats, or us, who think we know what’s best for other peoples’ communities.”

He said he’s heard from constituents that the power siting board process for these projects is “long, uncertain and costly for those who don’t want them.”

There are currently 364 turbines operating in Ohio, 106 turbines have been approved and 121 in pending projects, all in the northern half of the state, according to Ohio Power Siting Board data.


Senate Bill 52 would require developers to give notice to and share project details with township trustees 30 days before applying for a certificate from the Ohio Power Siting Board.

Trustees would then have 30 days to decide whether to pass a resolution allowing or requiring public input, or to do nothing, which would imply support for the project.

A resolution allowing public input would let residents petition for a referendum. The referendum, if allowed, would then be held during the next primary or general election.

The bill would also require a copy of the wind turbine manufacturer’s safety specifications, including the manufacturer’s recommended safety distances for the wind turbines, to be included in the certification application. The minimum setback will be whichever is greater, the current Ohio standards, or the distance in the safety manufacturer’s manual.

The bill is cosponsored by Republican Sens. George Lang, of West Chester; Michael Rulli, of Salem; Tim Schaffer, of Lancaster; Jerry Cirino, of Kirtland; Andrew Brenner, of Powell; and Kirk Schuring, of Canton.


Though Reineke said he’s not against wind or solar developments, he laid out a number of reasons why people may not want the clean energy generation in their backyards.

He mentioned concerns about decreased property values, noise and light pollution, impact on wildlife and the lifespan of wind turbines.

Reineke also talked about the effect wind turbines can have on agricultural land.

“These turbines take out a significant amount of space from our farms’ topsoil,” he said, in the hearing. “Their concrete base can be as large as 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide.”

Wind farms are typically built on private land that is leased or sold to developers. When asked about why others would be concerned with what landowners do on their own properties or farmland, Reineke told Farm and Dairy the size and magnitude of these wind farms impact neighboring properties.

“It completely transforms the landscape,” he said.

McColley said during the hearing that this would be no different than a local government using zoning laws to control what gets built on certain properties.


During the hearing, Reineke and McColley were asked why wind and solar were being singled out in this bill. McColley said the renewable energy takes up more acreage per megawatt produced than other forms of energy.

“There is nothing that takes up as many acres and disrupts as many acres as wind and solar,” McColley said. Additionally, Reineke said wind and solar are the only two forms of energy generation not regulated locally, although fracking too is only regulated at the state level.

A Ohio Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that the local governments do not have the power to ban or regulate fracking through zoning laws or other restrictions. Only the state has authority over the oil and gas industry.

(Reporter Rachel Wagoner can be contacted at 800-837-3419 or


Up-to-date agriculture news in your inbox!

Previous articlePeters Egbedi receives LACA Scholarship
Next articleVilsack confirmed as agriculture secretary
Rachel is Farm and Dairy's editor and a graduate of Clarion University of Pennsylvania. She married a fourth-generation farmer and settled down in her hometown in Beaver County, where she co-manages the family farm raising beef cattle and sheep with her husband and in-laws. Before coming to Farm and Dairy, she worked at several daily and weekly newspapers throughout Western Pennsylvania covering everything from education and community news to police and courts. She can be reached at or 724-201-1544.


  1. We am concerned about Ohio Senate Bill 52 and how it allows the general public decide on whether a solar farm can be built on someone’s else’s property. This borders on socialism and is a slippery slope. If this passes, what will be next, what a farmer can and can’t do on his farm based on what the community thinks at the time?
    This will mean that energy companies will avoid Ohio for most solar or wind projects and our state will lose out to other states in substantial economic benefits, and our state’s electric grid will be weakened just when more electric sources are needed. And landowners, local governments and schools will lose out on substantial, stable and long term income. Who is going to pay the landowners, usually farmers, for the lost income which would benefit the rural communities? And why does this legislation only affect solar and wind? Why aren’t factories, housing developments, shopping centers, and so on included? Maybe we should be able to vote on those too. A solar farm will enable land to be kept as farmland for generations – what’s wrong with that? Most of the people complaining about the solar farms are basing their worries on false and misleading information being spread by social media. Most complaints are from people moving out to live in the country who are new to the area, and haven’t paid taxes on these lands for 50 years or more. Please contact your state representative in Ohio and ask them to not pass this legislation and take us down the road of socialism!

  2. It is “socialism” to take control from a government agency (Ohio Siting Board) and return control to the local community??? Maybe you have a bigger dog in this fight than just property right?? $$$!
    I agree wholeheartedly with you on the rights of property owners to rent/sell their land for solar or wind farms.
    Home owners affected by those proposed solar & wind farms deserve equality property owner rights as well.
    A question for you. . . . How many Ohio farmland acres will be sacrificed for solar/wind farms??
    Will Ohioans prefer to be a solar/wind farm state, or remain an agricultural state?
    Last question. . . What will we eat?
    Germany saved their farmland by placing solar panels on roofs of exsisting bldgs NOT PRIME FARMLAND. How about all Federal/State/ & County buldings?


We are glad you have chosen to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated according to our comment policy.

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.