From tea bags to Miatas, bioplastics on the rise

According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, in 2012, the U.S. generated almost 32 million tons of plastic waste. But only 9 percent of that was recovered for recycling, leaving about 29 million tons. Some of it ends up in landfills and some of it ends up as ground litter or in the ocean. (National Science Foundation photo)

Chemists and other researchers are working up new formulas for greener plastic

WASHINGTON — It’s no longer common to hear, “Paper or plastic?” at the supermarket. In many jurisdictions, the plastic option is curbed. Hundreds of local governments around the world — even entire countries, such as China and India — ban or tax lightweight, single-use plastic bags.

bioplastics video from Science Nation
Click above to watch Science Nation video.

Every year in the United States, more governments enact such restrictions, as people grow more concerned about throwaways destined for landfills (or worse, for the open ocean). Businesses of all sizes are looking beyond petroleum-based plastics to alternatives derived from plants, or even synthesized by microorganisms.

The bioplastic revolution

Bioplastics are made wholly or in part from renewable biomass sources such as sugarcane and corn, or from the digest of microbes such as yeast. Some bioplastics are biodegradable or even compostable, under the right conditions. These new, more eco-friendly plastics are cropping up in all sorts of places, from tea bags to 3D printing media to medical implants.

In Finland, for example, consumers can now buy milk in cartons, made by Tetra Pak, that are 100 percent plant-based.

Recycled denim

In the United States, a small company called Iris Industries used Kickstarter to get off the ground with “Denimite,” a marbleized blue composite made of recycled denim and a thermoset resin binding agent that is partially bio-based. And National Science Foundation-funded Ecovative makes a packing material called “Myco Foam” that’s designed to replace polystyrene packaging, that bane of environmentally aware consumers who nevertheless buy take-out meals.

Growing market

Bio-based plastics are on the rise. The thriving European market for bioplastics is growing by more than 20 percent per year. Global demand is expected to rise by 19 percent annually through 2017, according to market research group Freedonia. Global production capacities are set to increase by 400 percent by 2018, with most bioplastics being produced in Asia, according to European Bioplastics (EUBP), an association that represents the interests of the industry in Europe.

More than packaging

Packaging has been, and still is, one of the most common uses for bioplastics, but there is growth in other areas, such as textiles and automotive applications.

“From functional sports garments with enhanced breathability to fuel lines, bioplastics are constantly spreading into new markets,” said EUBP chairman Francois de Bie.

Automotive uses

Even the sports-car market appreciates bioplastics. Mazda announced late last year that it would use a new bioplastic in the interior (and, eventually, exterior) of its MX5 Miata. In a December 2014 press release, the company says the plant-based plastic it developed with Mitsubishi Chemical Corp. can be dyed and has a higher-quality, less-toxic finish than traditional painted surfaces.

Likewise, the Ford Motor Co. said last July that it will work with Heinz to make plastic out of leftover tomato skins, for use in car wiring brackets and storage bins.

How plastics are born

All of this activity is exciting, but most of today’s plastic still comes from a nonrenewable resource: crude oil deposits in the earth. The oil is extracted and sent to a refinery to be distilled and yield an intermediate product called naphtha. Intense heat helps “crack” the naphtha into smaller hydrocarbon molecules such as ethylene and propylene.

These chemicals are combined with a catalyst and polymerized to form chains of many linked molecules — the materials we know as plastics. Different kinds of plastic will have varying polymer structures and distinct properties (toughness, stiffness, strength, transparency, etc.). Manufacturers then buy those bulk polymer pellets, granules or liquids for creating plastic in different shapes using processes such as extrusion or injection molding.


Many petroleum-based plastics don’t break down for hundreds, or even thousands, of years — the carbon-carbon bonds that form the polymers are that durable. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in 2012, the U.S. generated almost 32 million tons of plastic waste, but only 9 percent of that was recovered for recycling, leaving about 29 million tons. Much of the rest ends up in landfills, as ground litter or in the ocean.

Planting the next plastic

To spur solutions, some governments are promoting global and national bio-based economies or so-called bioeconomies. In 2012, the Obama administration released a National Bioeconomy Blueprint that calls for increased research and development, technology transfer, training and other steps to drive the nation’s bioeconomy. Businesses are interested in following that lead — in fact, they may actually be ahead of consumers, some of whom aren’t willing to pay a premium for greener plastics.

“The consumers want these materials, and they want to be more sustainable,” said Marc Hillmyer, director of the University of Minnesota’s Center for Sustainable Polymers (CSP). “But they’re generally not going to do it at a cost.

“What we hear from industry is, ‘Yes, we obviously have businesses that rely on petrochemical feed stocks, and we obviously want to be profitable in those businesses. But we want to be part of the future as well,” Hillmyer added.

Nearly three dozen company affiliates support the CSP’s work, including 3M, Ashland, BASF, Coca-Cola, General Mills, Henkel, Kimberly-Clark, Natureworks and Schlumberger, which make up the center’s Industrial Advisory Board.

The cost of green

Researchers working with businesses are challenged to make a material that will not only be biodegradable and nontoxic, but also cost-effective.

“Many people, including us, are very good at making expensive polymers that help us advance basic science but that are not economically all that viable,” Hillmyer said. “And so, what we’re really trying to emphasize in the center, again with industrial input, is how do we do it economically?”


There are many other challenges in developing new materials and getting them from the lab to the market.

“Our undergraduates, graduate students and postdocs all regularly hear from industry about the challenges that [companies] face when trying to introduce a new material into the marketplace,” said CSP Managing Director Laura Seifert.

“Can it be scaled up to an industrial process in an economically viable way? Can the material be used in existing infrastructure, or do we have to build an entirely new plant in order to adopt this new technology? And at the end of life … is it going to cause more harm than good to introduce this into our recycling stream?”

“These are hard problems,” said Hillmyer. “If it was easy, somebody would have done it.”

Millennial force

While the polymer industry is not going to shift overnight, in the long run change is inevitable, he added.

“The graduate students and postdoctoral researchers and undergraduates… in the center, they’re driven by these principles. So we are not having a hard time convincing them that this is something they should do.

“They’re growing up in this world [asking] ‘How do we make our world more sustainable?’”


Up-to-date agriculture news in your inbox!



We are glad you have chosen to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated according to our comment policy.

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.