Reports: Millions in pandemic spending wasted on USDA programs

1
722
sonny perdue loads box
Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue loads a box into a vehicle at the Farmers to Families Food Box distribution May 27, at the Westmoreland County Fairgrounds. (Rachel Wagoner photo)

The federal government can spend more money in 10 minutes than Congress, its watchdog, can track in 10 years. Still, Congressional oversight — as late and limited as it often is — remains a vital element of government.

The House Select Subcommittee on the coronavirus crisis proved just how vital in two reports released in October: Tens of millions in pandemic spending were wasted on programs run by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The first report, titled Farmers to Families? followed the money of the ill-conceived, poorly-run Farmers to Families Food Box program pushed in 2020 by the White House and Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue. Sold as a way to get fresh food to pandemic-hit American families, it also threw millions of taxpayer dollars at wildly unqualified vendors.

Public health ignored

The second report, titled A Memorandum, describes an even bigger scandal. Documents given to the subcommittee by the five principle meatpackers in the U.S. (JBS USA, Tyson Foods, Smithfield Foods, Cargill, and National Beef) show “at least 59,000 meatpacking workers were infected with the coronavirus during the first year of the pandemic — almost triple the 22,700 infections … previously estimated.”

Also, “At least 269 meatpacking workers lost their lives to the coronavirus between March 1, 2020, and Feb. 1, 2021 — over three times higher than what was previously estimated” noted the independent Food & Environment Reporting Network.

Worse, few of the workers had a choice in the life-and-death matter. In late April 2020, the Trump Administration used the Defense Production Act to order slaughterhouse workers back into packing plants where thousands got ill and hundreds died.

On Sept. 14, 2020, however, “emails obtained by ProPublica,” an independent, non-profit newsroom, “show(ed) that … just a week before the order was issued, the meat industry’s trade group,” the North American Meat Institute, “drafted an executive order that (carried) striking similarities to the one the president signed.”

So Big AgBiz used its political muscle to bulldoze aside public health — and public decency — to keep its kill lines and profits flowing at top speeds.

Unqualified contractors

One of the few things more profitable than meatpacking during the pandemic, according to the select subcommittee investigators, was contracting to distribute the USDA’s slapped-together Farmers to Families Food Box Program.

For example, according to the subcommittee, “The Trump Administration awarded contracts worth $16.5 million to Yegg, Inc., a self-described ‘Export Management, Trading, and Trade Finance company that had listed its most recent annual sales as $250,000…”

With that kind of institutional blindness, little wonder the USDA later “reimbursed Yegg for more than $2.85 million worth of milk and dairy boxes purportedly delivered to … a nonprofit operated by the wife of the company’s CEO …”

The USDA also oversaw a food box contract “worth $39 million to CR8AD8, LLC, a company focused on wedding planning and event planning without significant food distribution experience … ”

Experience? Come on, noted one of its owners, how hard could it be “compared to … his usual work of ‘stuffing tchotchkes into bags.’”

Actually, it paid far better than tchotchke-stuffing: “CRE8AD8 was ultimately paid $31.5 million of this contract,” explained the subcommittee report.

The slickest icing on the USDA cake, however, was the award of a $40 million contract to something called Ben Holtz Consulting, Inc.

When the USDA application asked the company to list references, the applicant — presumably Mr. Ben Holtz himself — replied “‘I don’t have any,’” noted the investigators.

The company’s honesty didn’t pay; USDA canceled the contract “before any payments were made,” maybe, investigators suggest, because its proposal “pitched an unusually broad range for delivery capacity: between 5,000 and 200,000 16-18 pound boxes of produce per week.”

In releasing the Farmers to Families report Oct. 13, Subcommittee Chairman James Clyburn, D-SC, noted the program “was marred by a structure that prioritized industry over families … cutting corners over competence, and … politics over the public good.”

That’s another truism in Washington: Policy drift usually leads to political grift.

STAY INFORMED. SIGN UP!

Up-to-date agriculture news in your inbox!

SHARE
Previous articleThink about manure pit safety during fall nutrient application
Next articleReduce forage loss during winter feeding
Alan Guebert was raised on an 800-acre, 100-cow southern Illinois dairy farm. After graduation from the University of Illinois in 1980, he served as a writer and editor at Professional Farmers of America, Successful Farming magazine and Farm Journal magazine. His syndicated agricultural column, The Farm and Food File, began in June, 1993, and now appears weekly in more than 70 publications throughout the U.S. and Canada. He and spouse Catherine, a social worker, have two adult children. farmandfoodfile.com

1 COMMENT

  1. Gollee , imagine an emergency program run by the government ..that is flawless. Did people who needed food..get it?
    I am confused as to the meatpackers line employees in total # ( adjusted yet again) having COVID as a relevant comment to gov waste.
    We in meat production AG are all VERY aware of the processing shutdowns due to COVID ..what was your point exactly?
    Your comment taken with the revision of COVID statistics constantly changing is a useless ‘quasi fact” ;the processing lines shut down due to employee COVID , well reported in real time..then. Exactkly how you ‘count” who had COVID then and now changes ..nothing. Kris vanderman /JNK ranch

LEAVE A REPLY

We are glad you have chosen to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated according to our comment policy.

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.