Knives, forks, and farmers favor acting on immigration

1
183

When Internal Revenue Service (IRS) workers returned to their jobs Jan. 28 after the recent 35-day government shutdown, an estimated five million pieces of unopened mail awaited.

Equally daunting, the shutdown coincided with the IRS’s hiring of its annual army of temporary workers to process the impending tax season’s mail.

The delay now leaves the IRS months behind in what most Americans see as the agency’s most important job: sending out their tax refunds. This is just one of the unforeseen messes — there are hundreds more — confronting government departments powering up after the partial federal shutdown that cost the U.S. economy an estimated $11 billion and resolved exactly nothing.

Another shutdown

Worse, the U.S.-Mexico “wall” fight between the White House and Congressional Democrats still remains as another threatened shutdown looms Feb. 15. No matter how this fight ends, no solution currently under discussion addresses the most pressing immigration problem facing American farmers and eaters: the growing unmet need for immigrant labor to deliver much of the abundant, cheap food this nation enjoys.

In fact, the growing labor shortage in California, the nation’s premier food-producing state, is so severe that 55 percent of its farmers told the state’s Farm Bureau affiliate in a 2017 poll that they experienced a “severe labor shortage,” USA Today recently reported. (The story was published, ironically, two days after the White House agreed to a ceasefire in its wall battle.)

The poll also showed that another 33 percent of California farmers “were delaying harvesting, eliminating crops and neglecting critical tasks such as pruning” because they simply couldn’t find people to do the work.

Guest workers

More shocking, the poll also revealed that the government’s often-reformed H-2A agricultural (guest) worker program is a bust; only four percent of farmers used it to hire legal immigrant labor. The labor shortage is leading farmers to change in ways that aren’t good for rural California and the nation.

For example, many are leaving crops to rot or allowing land to lay idle. The cutbacks cost consumers and pinch local economies. Another solution, notes USA Today, is even more stark. “The most blunt of agriculture veterans simply say that their futures may involve … operating solely out of Mexico-based operations or possibly shuttering their businesses altogether.” How crazy is that? Without a reliable, legal migrant workforce steadily moving north, U.S. farming operations could be steadily moving south.

The person holding the key to unlock this dilemma, President Donald J. Trump, has often told farmers he will help.

“You need these people,” he recently told delegates to the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) convention in New Orleans. “We’re going to make it easier.”

Entering the country

The Trump White House, in fact, has made it much harder for even legal and asylum-seeking immigrants to enter the U.S.

Still, its actions don’t mean today’s much-tinkered with immigration system is workable. If anything, it points to the need for a dramatic overhaul. According to the USA Today report, two California lawmakers, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Rep. Zoe Lofgren, both Democrats, have a plan called The Agricultural Worker Program Act.

It would “grant ‘blue card’ status to immigrants who have worked in agriculture for at least 100 days over the past two years.”

The sticking point, however, may be that the blue card, “a reward for being an engine in the economy,” could lead to a residency permit “within a few years.”

As such, few GOP politicians, and no one in the White House, will touch it. That vacuum offers farmers and ranchers the opportunity to lead on immigration.

The guts

They have, after all, both the need and the president’s ear. But do they, including Big Ag’s most Trump-favored farm group, the AFBF, have the guts to help broker an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system so that it ensures both justice to the immigrants and a steady flow of high quality, reasonably-priced food to the nation?

It’s a bold move now in need of bold leaders.

STAY INFORMED. SIGN UP!

Up-to-date agriculture news in your inbox!

SHARE
Previous articleRoundup of 4-H news for Feb. 7, 2019
Next articleAdaptability is key for employment
Alan Guebert was raised on an 800-acre, 100-cow southern Illinois dairy farm. After graduation from the University of Illinois in 1980, he served as a writer and editor at Professional Farmers of America, Successful Farming magazine and Farm Journal magazine. His syndicated agricultural column, The Farm and Food File, began in June, 1993, and now appears weekly in more than 70 publications throughout the U.S. and Canada. He and spouse Catherine, a social worker, have two adult children. farmandfoodfile.com

1 COMMENT

  1. This disappointing mindset shows why American farmers have been literally decimated. Huge food processing monopolies as well as government promises of cheap, inexpensive food has devestated farmers, pushing small farmers who provided their own labor out of existence. The remaining farms have become too large for owners to work themselves-the owners becoming ‘computer’ farmers who are not paid enough to pay wages comparable to factory work-encouraging illegal criminals into America for cheap labor. Older farmers and those pushed out are sickened over this mindset. Let people literally go hungry and raise the price of food to a level small farmers who provided their own labor can make a living from. People have been so used to having the cheapest, safest food in the entire history of mankind, they have destroyed the majority of farmers and are now willing to destroy the greatest country made-America (USA) just to keep full bellies and pockets-and goverment officials and SOME brainwashed people proclaiming to be farmers/friends of farmers pushing this destructive mindset…..disgusting!!!!

LEAVE A REPLY

Receive emails as this discussion progresses.